More Muscat and the first of the 2010 Cal blend bottled

We bottled 3 more gallons of the Muscat for next week's party, and Mike bottled 5 gallons of the fabulous 2010 Cal blend.  That gives us +3 cases of 2010 Muscat, 2 cases of 2009 Merlot, 2 cases of 2010 Cal blend, about 2 cases of various 2007 Sangiovese, Barbera blend, and Tutto Rosso, and a case of our 2006 Zin Alicante blend.  If that's not enough... begorah!

Bottling some of the 2010 Muscat

Titrate tested all three carboys of the Muscat - all between 17 and 20 ppm SO2.  What I'm bottling now for immediate use in this year's new wine party I'm leaving at the current level.  Bottled a couple of cases and need to decide whether to bottle another 5 gal, or the 3.

During the winter I thought this year's wine was more floral than last year's, but it no longer seems that way.  I do think it's a bit higher in acid and I like that: more hello.

Muscat labels, 2010

Tasting the pooptivo

With only 21 days left until the yearly new wine party, we haven't bottled any of the 2010 wines.  We don't really figure to bottle any of the primitivo, though we could use our topping gallon, but we do figure to use at least 8 or 10 gallons of the muscat.  Obviously it won't get to rest in the bottle at this point: do it now?  Days before the party?  At the party as a game? 

So, I tasted the primitivo this morning. 
Still some barnyard odors, but very much dissipated from the last tasting.  Lots of cherry.  After aerating it a bit there's no hint of the barnyard in the taste - cherry and caramel says my blunt instrument of a tongue - but a very noticeable smoothness and long, long finish that I don't think we've had in any of our other efforts in the last 5 years.  Suave.  Smoove. 

Poopitivo racked & oaked; 2008 Cab S. tasted

We forged ahead and racked and oaked to Poopitivo.  Lori is grossed out by it and I kind of like it.  Racking was really only to help get it off the little sediments it was on with the hope of lessening the barnyard odors.

We also took the opportunity to pop open the 100 liter tank of North Fork Cab S from 2008.  A little brown around the edges - oxidized, just don't trust that tank - with not a big nose, but much more tamed and tasty than in prior tastings.  No reason not to have some at the summer party, and Lori thinks we ought to blend some of it.  Did not taste the 2 carboys  of Peter's batch of this wine..

We're going to rack the Poopitivo one more time

Lazy us, we were going to oak the Primitivo  today with medium toast American oak from Barrel Mills - and at the last moment we decided to rack it one more time.  So we'll do that tomorrow morning when we have a bit more time and less sun. 

Barnyard nose is the driver - though I have to say that, personally, I kind of like it.  Am thinking of doing a new label that makes the point.

2010 Cal Blend is oaked

Mike and Pam used Barrel Mill medium toast French oak swizzle sticks.  The oak went into the existing carboys - did not rack again.

Oak decisions, 2010 reds

We're going with light toast American oak from Barrel Mill for the primitivo.

Mike and Pam are working on their decision for the Cal blend.

Solera?

Lori and I were chatting about maybe holding back some of the 2009 Merlot blend to do a solera / perpetuum with.  Not with the same wine every year, but say start with a 5 gallon carboy of the 2009 Merlot blend, draw of a gallon of it some time in 2011 and replace it with a gallon of our primary 2010 red - the Primitivo.  Year after year we'd draw of 5 bottles and top off with the prior year's red.

The alternative might be to say, OK, we're going to make a Muscat every year, and do the perpetuum with that.  That could be particularly intense - older whites and holding us to a commitment to a particular grape.  Better idea?

2010 wines, SO2 added

I didn't take new readings, but working from last week's readings I raised all vessels about 30 ppm using a 10% potassium metabisulfite solution.  That's something like 1.2 tsp for the 3 gallon carboys and 2.03 tsp for the 5 gallon carboys.  Spit in the ocean for the 1 gallon jugs.  Should put us between 40 and 50 ppm, depending on how much the racking changed things last week - some of the vessels racked smooth and slow, and others were more agitated.

2nd racking of 2010 wines, at long last

Two weeks late for the reds, and three weeks late for the whites, we finally racked yesterday.  Lori and I started around 9:00 or 9:30 with the primitivo and finished up around 10:00 or 10:30 when Mike got there.  Then we racked the blend, and after that the muscat.  We were all washed up by noon. 

We did all of the work downstairs in the cellar - though I did shovel a path to the cellar trap door and I shoveled most of the back patio if we wanted to or had to wash any of the carboys outside.  (I thought we would for the muscat - more below.)  I alos set up a 6 foot table in the cellar for us to work off of rather than the small bench.

Started with PH and S02 readings (which I'll fill in below).  Did all of our racking without adding meta, but will likely go back and do so to bring things to 40 ppm.  Also mixed a new batch of 10% solution, good for a couple of months.  Need to order new Accuvin S02 tests (or settle on a replacement).

The primitivo is likely the only one of the wines that suffered for the late racking, and that only because of the barnyard odors of the yeast strain we used.  The sooner off those lees, the sooner we lose the funk.  And the lees, ladies and gentlemen, defined funk: animal, not vegetal.  Couldn't smell anything through the haze, but the taste is clearing and very cherry (I thought).  We wound up with an awkward amount of wine and finished in 3x5 and a 1.

The Grimaldi Savino blend is tasting great.  Mike says it's the magic of the petit verdot.  Who's to say no?  Very little mud, and very little loss: 3x5, 1x1, 1x.750.

The muscat is the wine I had been most worried about, never having used bentonite before.  I thought the lees were a solid clay and was really worried to have left things the extra weeks.  But that was not the case at all.  The wine has much more fruit than I remember from this time last year, and a much fresher citrus taste.  Because we had 3x750 corked and cold from the first racking we were able to end up about 700 ml short of our 2x5 1x3, so we topped the three with most of a bottle of commercial Alsatian muscat ottonnel.  Cousins.  Ben @ Slope Cellars sometimes does have a muscat alexandria from CA., but not right now.  So that 3 gal. carboy will be a little bit of a trip.  We should look down the road to see if we want to blend it.  The two fives are straightforward.  The three is about two thirds straight stuff, and the remainder is 3/4 cold stabilized and 1/4 commercial.

And - the muscat lees turned out to be fine and soft and easy enough to take care of in the slop sink.  All is well.

2009 Merlot blend, SO2, MLF and topping up

Been meaning to do this for over a month - checked the SO2 levels on the remaining bulk 2009 wine (5+5+1+1), and as expected it was pretty much depleted.  Added 10% solution to get it to about 40 or 50 ppm, opened a bottle we corked in August of 2010 and used it to top off, and replaced the airlocks with solid stoppers.  (Well, really I replaced the airlocks in the orange 2-way caps with solid covers.)

Also tested for MLF (Accuvin) and it looks like that was complete.

My only hesitation in this was whether to bottle one of the carboys instead of capping it: decided to pass on that, and count on what's already bottled plus the 2010 Muscat (plus maybe some of the cal-blend Grimaldi-Savino?) to entertain the wine party crowd in June of 2010.   (If I were less lazy maybe I'd do an MLF test on the August bottle I just opened as a topper?)

2010 Reds first racking

Racked both red wines today.

Free SO2 looked to be very low, and we went for a full 50 ppm, adding about a tablespoon of 10% solution to each 5 gallon carboy.  (Note to self: need to make another batch of 10% solution before next work - this one is good only through December 8.)

Both wines looked very clean - not very much lost to the lees. 

Primitivo went from 5+5+5+5+1 to 5+5+5+5, but had to use a wee but of lees and 750 ml of commercial zinfandel to get there.

Blend went from 5+5+5+3 to 5+5+5+1+1, using a tad of lees and no commercial topper.

All in all, and easy day of work, though way cold outside for the wash-up.

Diversion: 100percentcork.org

A trade organization that's advertising on NPR.  100percentcork.org.  Cork not just as good for closing wine bottles, but as natural, renewable and supporting biodiversity.

Why 100 Percent Natural Cork from Citizen on Vimeo.

Staten Island Red, Nov 14

Dipped a tube into one of the carboys yesterday and was very pleased with what I tasted. This is the first time I've done the malolactic fermentation--introduced the bacteria a month ago--and I'm impressed. That sharp, seemingly green edge which has been dominant in all the reds I think I've made through the first year had subsided some, revealing some of the wines fruit--a melange of raspberry and cherry as near as I can tell at this point.

I'll man up the SO2 tomorrow. Doug advises that a tsp of the potassium bisulfate per 5 gal carboy will put me in the vicinity of 40-50 ppm, so that's what I'll do.

2010 Reds, 5 weeks in

Took a look at the Primitivo, it's possible that the the TA is still 9 g/L and the malic acid is still 110 mg/L, but it's also possible that we're at 8.5 and 75.  Can't tell what's real and what's wishful interpretation of the Accuvin charts.  PH seems to be 3.53, down from 3.57 by meter.  Splitting hairs.

Haven't tested the Cal Blend yet - waiting to see if the Savino Grimaldi clan visits.

Need to consider if we want to rack next week, or wait on a positive change of the malic acid toward 30 mg/L.

2010 Muscat, first racking

The plan:

• Add Bentonite with the racking - 5% slurry based on 1 g Bentonite per 1 gal of wine: so a carboy gets a slurry of 5 g bentonite, 95 g water. Let the slurry sit for 2 hours.
• Boost the SO2 from 12 to 40 or 50 ppm. Will add 2 tsp of 10% solution.

The reality:
Well, gee, it was just like the plan.  Peter came over and we whipped through it.  Started with 14 gallons (5+5+3+1) and finished with +13 (5+5+3 3x750 ml).  The 750's are pretty gunky, but we're just looking at them as toppers.  Don't have proper sized drilled bungs for them, so have corked them and thrown them into the fridge.  Will get stoppers and see what can be done.

This is our first use of bentonite. 

2010 Muscat, 6 weeks in

Ready to rack.
PH 3.61 (meter)
TA 9 g/L
Free SO2 11 ppm by Titret

This was the first use of the meter, and the first use of Titrets.  Love the Titrets!!  (I interpreted Accuvin as 4 ppm, which would have been close enough.)

2010 Reds, one month in

Using Accuvin, both wines show 110 mg/L - unchanged from last week.  Hmmm.  I've known for a long time that I'm not the most color acute person in the world: maybe I'm just not an Accuvin guy?  (But, really, no change from last week.)  Raise the temp in that part of the cellar?

Used the new Hanna meter for the PH.  3.45 on the Cal Blend and 3.58 on the Primitivo.  Last week we tried these tests by Accuvin and settled on 3.8 for the Primitivo and 3.5 for the blend.  I guess in the long run, unless you're making adjustments, using the same test consistently is all you really need, but I'm glad to use an instrument where I can.  I don't see myself setting up lab apparatus to replace the Accuvin.  (But I have priced it out, just for the heck of it...)

Anyway, the thing to think about is whether to try to force the MLF along, and whether we can do it without adversely affecting the Muscat that we want to keep cooler in the same space.

Buying consortium?

I've met a few other winemakers recently, and I'm wondering if we pooled our dollars, if we could negotiate discounts on some of our supplies. The main thing I'm thinking of at this point is bottles. If we bought, say, 25 cases of bottles, could we get the price down to 50 cents a bottle? Corks, too.

Grapes are trickier, but it might make some sense to explore what we could negotiate if we eliminated the middle man, but the grape is complicated in ways bottles aren't because we'd probably have to get on the same page with a grape to be of interest to a vineyard.

What's everyone think?

Bernardo

Staten Island Red, Nov 6

The wine is quiet and clarifying. Following Doug's advice at PI, I'm going to let the malo-lactic fermentation bug have its way with the wine for another week; then, I'll add S02. Keeping the temp steady at about 64.

2009 Merlot, 13 months in

We still have 12 gallons of the 2009 Merlot blend in bulk - two 5 gallon carboys of free run, and two 1 gallon jugs of pressed.  Since we have fresh Accuvin tests laying around, I thought I'd poke into one of the carboys and take a look - these wines had never had free SO2 or malic acid or PH tests done before.

• Free SO2: about 23 ppm.  That's how I interpret the color chart.  I would have thought lower, but if that's right, I'm happy and ready to boost it.
•  TA: 6.5 g/L.  Low end of the acceptable range for red.
• PH: 3.8.  Really?  Really?  (Presque Isle, darn it, send my darned meter so I don't have to do the color chart for this one, eh?).  Well, if it's true, lots of SO2 to add.
• Malic Acid: 30 to 50 mg/L. 

As a newbie to testing, I'm surprised the PH is so high if the TA is so low.  Happy about the malic acid level. 

I think I'll wait on the delivery of the PH meter before adding SO2.  And we can decide then, too, whether to bottle or leave the wine in bulk.

2010 Reds, day 22 - readings

Primitivo:

• PH 3.8, 
• SO2 18 ppm, 
• Malic Acid 110 mg/L

We didn't have PH tests (and my meter still hasn't arrived from PI Wine, sigh) when we started, so this is the first reading.  Corresponds to the high acid readings we started with, which we're hoping will be brought down by the MLF.

I think the SO2 is where we want it to be right now, low enough not to inhibit MLF.  Target SO2 for wine this high in PH would be pretty darned high, and if we hit our target Malic Acid, we'll boost the SO2 accordingly.

As with PH, we started the process without a Malic Acid reading, so 110 mg/L is the level we'll ride into next week's tests.  Could have been 2 to 3 times as high at start. Just dunna know.  Target is 30 mg/L.

And for the heck of it, of course I also tasted the juice.  As warned by the yeast sellers, this strain leaves a barnyard nose which dissipates over 6 months of aging: mooooo.   Very tart, but no off tastes at all.

And Mike's come over to test the...
Cal Blend:

• PH 3.3, 
• SO2 23 ppm, 
• Malic Acid 110 mg/L

Wow wow, seeing the different PH readings of the two and then tasting the two is a very short, very clear lesson in what PH does to your mouth.

2010 Reds, day 16: malolactic bugs added

Mike over this morning and we added the bugs and Optimalo to all vessels of both wines.  That's a full week after the Cal Blend press and 5 full days after the Primitivo crush. 

Also tested TA with fresh Accuvin kits - up around 9 for both wines.  We're looking for the MLF to bring it down some.  PH meter still hasn't arrived (halloooo, Presque Isle?) so we're just guessing it's hand in hand with the acid.

And ran into Bernardo on the street - he's put the bugs into his Staten Island red: don't know if he also used any nutrients.

Let's MLF

I think both groups bought the same malolactic bacteria - Enoferm B - and I'm going to forge on here with that assumption.

The 2.5 g package of EB is good for 66 gallons of wine.  We have 21 gallons of Primitivo and 18 gallons of the Merlot / Cab / P. Verdot, so we can use a single package if we're going to work the two wines at the same time.

EB wants to be hydrated in 20 times it's own weight of 20 C chlorine-free water for not more than 15 minutes.  2.5 g package of EB, 50 g water, 50 g water = just a tad over 1/4 cup.  So, dump the packet in 1/4 C room temp distilled water and set the timer for 12 minutes.

We're also going to use Optimalo Plus as a nutrient for the malolactic bugs.  1 g per gallon, dissolved in just enough water or wine, and then added and stirred into the body of the wine prior to adding the malolactic bugs.  So, use a wine thief to draw off some wine from each vessel, weigh & add proper amount of Optimalo, swish-wait-dump-stir.  The Optimalo comes in 6 g packages, so for the 5 gallon carboys we can weigh out the 5 g or eyeball it - you're call.

By the time we've added all of the nutrients we should be ready to add the bugs.  Let's use a rule of 1 ml of hydrated bug juice per gallon of wine.  I'm basing this on our 1/4 cup = 2 oz = +59 ml for 66 gallons, round it off to 1 ml per gallon and round that to 5 ml per carboy = 1 tsp bug juice.  Jah?  So add 1 tsp bug juice to the 5 gallon carboys that already have nutrients added, stir, cap, relax.

2010 Reds, day 13

7 AM:
An uptick in bubbling activity from four of the five Primitivo vessels.  Two days post zero Brix.  Maybe MLF?  No similar activity from the Cal Blend, but I may have missed it if it was short lived.  So: we need to set the date for adding the MLF bugs and nutrients.  Suggestions have been from 2 days post press, to 7.

National Grid confirms: decline of home winemaking in Brooklyn

A meter reader from National Grid was just here.  As I led him down to the cellar I apologized for everything being a jumble - I still haven't stowed the press and the primary fermenters and the carboys we didn't use.  Now this was an experienced guy I was with, someone who sees a lot of Brooklyn cellars.  He said, You don't see much wine making any more.  I also do a route in Bensenhurst, and you see a few older Italian guys out there.

2010 Reds, day 11

5:30 AM:
Yes, because I'm me I'm already futzing around getting ready.

7 AM:
Press is cleaned, carboys are meta'd, Primitivo is at -0.4 B.  Oven is at 500 F and ready to bake a breakfast wine-dough pizza.  (I kid you not.)  All that's needed now is for some of the partners to awaken.  Weather is cool and wet - don't think we've pressed on a rainy day before.

9 AM:
Stunning!  Finished pressing, cleaned up, and wondering where we're going to stow the new fermenters and all.  Mike & Peter both here to work the wine.  Purple breakfast pizza was AOK.

21 gallons total - 15 free flow in carboys + 1 gallon, and a mixed 5 gallons of free flow (2) + press (3).  Will start a separate 2010 yield post to track the three wines - all of which started with 8 cases and are in very different places after pressing.

2010 Reds, day 10

7 AM:
Primitivo is 70 F, 0.2 B.  We're set to press it at 8:30 tomorrow morning.

Three of the Cal Blend carboys burped into their bubblers (they were topped off very high) and I've cleaned those up.  Looking good.

8 PM:
Primitivo 70 F, -0.3 B.  We've shifted press time to 7:30 AM Tuesday.  Don't be shy, boys and girls, ther'll be plenty of coffee.

2010 Reds, day 9

8 AM:
Both musts at 72 F.  Cal Blend -0.4 Brix, Primitivo +1.6 Brix.  Definitely pressing day for the Cal.  Targeting noon.  Problem with the Primitivo is we know we cannot crush tomorrow, so if we forgo today we're at Tuesday and an unplanned for extended maceration. We'll decide at noon.

12 noon:
Pressing time for the Cal Blend.  10 gallons free run, 5 gallons 50/50, 3 gallons pressed.  Juice was beautiful, and berries in the press cake were very dry.  Any more yield and we'd have been busting things.

At about 2 we had the wine-pizza.  I made two small ones - and here's the one that's shaped sort of like Africa. 

Not a bad thing to do as a tradition, but not something I want to do instead of my usual dough.

8 PM:
Primitivo 72 F, 0.7 B.  At this rate we'll be at zero tomorrow morning or noon, but we won't be able to press until Wednesday morning (the 19th).  Not ideal, but not terrible.  We'll keep a lid on it.

Day 8 (S.I.): full-tilt boogie

To crush is human; to press, divine is what the bard really meant to say.

The must was nearly still when I pressed yesterday. I tried a little of the wine as it came out the press's spout, and it's already showing a display of fruits and notes: I'm getting raspberry and the 1040, sched. D. No, I don't know--raspberry and something. The recipe I used was different from past barbera's simply because Mrs. Lapide was down to 5 crates of barbera--so there's twice the alicante in this wine and almost twice the grenache. We made a 70-20-10 barbera in the past; this one is a 50-30-20.

The yield was 28 beautiful gallons--I thought I'd get 30+. I was thinking 33, but considering how hot and dry the summer was, it's no wonder the yield's a little low. Anyone follow the weather in CA this past summer? Was it as hot and dry as ours?

Going to add the malo-lactic bug tomorrow, and will add some SO2 sometime soon. I think in the anaerobic state I can introduce them together, but I'm not sure.

Purple pizza

Ever since we read about cakes made with the pressed must I've been hankering to fool around with flour and the wine, so...

Have started a pizza dough using a cup of the still fermenting primitivo must, Montrechet Red Star wine yeast (1 tsp), a little more water, 2 cups all purpose flour and one cup bread flour, 2 tsp. salt.  Usually I like to use about 2 or 2.5 cups all purpose and 1/2 or 1 cup whole wheat, but I thought the Montrechet not find tougher access to anything it could eat in the flour very funny.

Going through first rise now.  Will report back.

OK, here it is after first rise - which was about the same time it might have been with baker's yeast and water. It's more purple in real life than it appears here in web-safe color land.  It smells like, uh, fermenting wine rather than like bread.  Will do a second rise and then chill it for use tomorrow.  More later.  So far so good.

Ahh, the second rise. Didn't color-safe it, so maybe there'll be more to see if you drill in.  And I thought it would be nice to do the second rise on a green board.

2010 Reds, day 8

7:30 AM:
Mike over to do the honors.  Cal B 74 F, 1.3 B.  Primitivo 73 F, 3.7 B.  We're assuming a press f the Cl B tomorrow, and assuming we will no be pressing the Primitivo tomorrow.

Chatting about when to initiate the MLF.  Bernardo says that Doug of Presque Isle recommends two days after pressing, when things are settled and we're not introducing any more oxygen into the wine.  Makes good sense to me.

3:00 PM:
Punchdown of both wines, without readings.  The ferm still be doing.

It's sharply cooler outdoors today, and the heat has been on in the house a couple of times, but the cellar temperature is unchanged - between 65 and 68 over the last 8 days.  This would have been ideal for the Muscat, but when we worked that wine the weather and house were still very warm - 75 to 76 F in the cellar when we crushed, and down to 72 later that week when the wine went to zero Brix.  Perverse.  Mike's fretted out loud a number of times in the last week about the low temperature of the Cal Blend must - and maybe it would have gone to the 80's if the cellar were in the mid 70's.  (I'm guessing Mike goes for a heat girdle next year, just in case.)

Staten Island Red, Day 7

We're flying at an altitude of about .65 acidity and 68 degrees. Cap has fallen apart and is not reforming. No froth--just some increasingly feeble bubbles each time I stir. I'm going to press tomorrow--aiming for 30-33 gallons of vino. Don't have a brix reading because the hydrometer arrived yesterday, but I'm guessing from the taste of the drops that I let fall into my hand from the stirring stick that I'm in the low single digits.

2010 Reds, day 7

Calibration: 
Using plain water, which the short scale hydrometer read as zero or darn close to it, I adjusted the paper scale in the regular hydrometer by nearly 5 B. Squirrels.  Haven't yet adjusted the spreadsheets to reflect corrected readings - and of course the long scale may have changed a bit over the week.  In another year I'll either resolve to check it every day - or just buy a new one that's less flaky.  Anywho...

6 AM:
Cal Blend 77 F and 4.6 B on the real live short scale hydrometer.Still putting up a bug cap, but ferment is calming.  Primitivo 76 F and 6.5 B on the newly calibrated long scale.  (Lori and I constantly read the thermometer we're using differently - Lori would read this temp as 72.)

And the Muscat... not clear yet but still brightening.  This is day 21 for that wine.  In 2009 we racked it at day 43 or so (starting from press).  That was the same time we racked the reds.  This year the white and red will be maybe three weeks apart, I'm guessing.

11:30 PM:
Cal Blend 75 F, 2.3 B; Primitivo 4.7 F and 74 F.Still good sized caps, but obviously less less active underneath when punched down.  Random berry tasting has the Primitivo tasting more sweet, and the Cal B tasting... what?  tart?  Someone else ought to give it a taste.

Time to figure out when the MLF bugs get added.
Sunday press, at least for the Cal B?

Fresh Accuvin acid tests have arrived, and Titret tests that can be used to measure SO2 in the Muscat (but not the red wines).

Staten Island Red, Day 6

Situation here:

Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things just don't seem the same
Actin' funny, but I don't know why
'Scuse me while I kiss the sky.

In other words, cake still forming but down to about 2 inches, less warmth, grapes soft and all red-purple, froth diminishing but still present, aroma deepening towards wine.

2010 Reds, day 6

5:30 AM:
Caps are still at their highest.  I have the exhaust fan off for the first time this week, and in the relative silence the fermentation vats are gurgling and snap crackle popping away like fools.  Cal Blend 77 F and +5 Brix (estimate 6 - see my posting on calibration).  Primitivo 74 F and 6 B (which might adjust to 8 or 9).  Tasted some of the grapes and there's a definite change now - no longer sweet fruit.

5:30 PM:
Holding temps and caps.  Am going to ignore Brix until morning and calibrate the hydrometers then.  Neither wine a a true 5 B yet.

9:30 PM
One last punch down for the day.

I remember again why I should calibrate that darned hydrometer

Yeah, the old one that doesn't have a visual calibration guide.  As we're approaching dry I've switched to the short scale hydrometer (+5 to -5) and it's pretty apparent there's a 2 or 3 Brix disagreement.  3, probably.  I'll add an "adjusted Brix" column to the tracking spreadsheet, and note in posts which device I'm using.  Begorah.

(The also probably explains the diference between the initial refractometer readings and the initial hydrometer readings.)

Let's get a little geeky, 2010 vs 2009

Yeah, baby, that's what I'm saying.  You see it more clearly in the second two charts, where the temps and Brix are done separately.  But with the Montrechet yeasts added in jumbo quantities and with crush, temps shot up above 80 and Brix shot downward.  (Day 5 for 2009 Brix is an estimate - may well have been zero-ish already.)  Will updat ethe charts as we go into days 6 and beyond.

2010 Reds, day 5

6 AM:
Cal B 78 F, 8 Brix, maintaining it's largest cap.  Primitivo 76 F and 11.5 B.  Not measuring Brix last evening let us shoot past where I wanted to add Fermaid K (which, I know, probably is the best indication that I really don't need to).  Did add it this morning, but 20 g rather than the 30 I had in my mind to have added at the 2/3 sugar point.

Cal B is notably looser, but not in the same loose as a goose way of the Primitvo.  Mike is hoping for a Sunday pressing.

Afternoon:
[Lori says...] Beautiful - at least a five inch cap and HOT! (though looks like it was just as hot this morning).

8 PM:
Both wines still have their largest caps.  CalBlend looks lie 5 Brix on the standard hydrometer, but the short scale hydrometer says we're not there yet.  Primitivo looks to be at 8 Brix.